What are your thoughts on a future where code is represented as a structured model, rather than text? Do you think that AI-powered coding assistants benefit from that?

It’s important to realize that “modern “AI” doesn’t understand human level meanings any better today (in many cases: worse!). So it is not going to be able to serve as much of a helper in a general coding assistant.

Another canonical form could be Lisp S-expressions, etc.

in structures, such as:

Are today’s baseball pitchers faster than a few years ago, or is it that radar guns have improved and get the pitch speed as it is released rather than as it reaches the plate?

These structures are made precisely to allow programs to “reason” about some parts of lower level meaning, and in many cases to rearrange the structure to preserve meaning but to make the eventual code that is generated more efficient.

a b i 1 x []

Long ago in the 50s this was even thought of as a kind of “AI” and this association persisted into the 60s. Several Turing Awards were given for progress on this kind of “machine reasoning”.

LIVE: Reaction as Russell wins but Piastri and Norris collide in Canada - racingnews365.com

First, it’s worth noting that the “syntax recognition” phase of most compilers already does build a “structured model”, often in what used to be called a “canonical form” (an example of this might be a “pseudo-function tree” where every elementary process description is put into the same form — so both “a + b” and “for i := 1 to x do […]” are rendered as

plus(a, b) for(i, 1, x, […])

+ for

Scientists Stunned by Evidence of Ancient Birds Nested in the Arctic - The Daily Galaxy

/ \ and ⁄ / | \

i.e. “operator like things” at the nodes …

A slogan that might help you get past the current fads is:

Apple’s SVP Of Software Engineering Craig Federighi Wants To Maintain The iPad’s Simplicity, Making It The Best Touch Computer, As He Responds To The Possibility Of These Tablets Running macOS - Wccftech

Most coding assistants — with or without “modern “AI” — also do reasoning and manipulation of structures.

NOT DATA … BUT MEANING!